Which practice is most effective for identifying students who may be at risk for learning difficulties?

The most effective practice for identifying students who may be at risk for learning difficulties is the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) or Response to Intervention (RtI). This approach encompasses a systematic method of screening and assessing students' academic and behavioral performance, allowing educators to identify those who are struggling early on. MTSS and RtI are designed to provide targeted interventions tailored to individual student needs. This proactive method emphasizes continuous monitoring and adjusts the level of support based on student response, which makes it more effective in recognizing and addressing learning difficulties promptly.

In contrast, standardized test scores can provide important data but often do not reveal the full scope of a student's abilities or struggles, as they may not account for the diverse learning needs of all students. Individualized education program evaluations are specifically designed for students who have already been identified as needing special education services, meaning they do not serve as a screening tool for all students. District-wide assessments can gather broad information on student performance but may lack the individualized detail necessary to effectively identify risks before significant issues arise.

Thus, the MTSS/RtI framework stands out as the most comprehensive and responsive approach to identifying and supporting at-risk students.